Dispute Against Unfair Ratings

Fair, evidence-based review of rating concerns.

GigBig allows freelancers to request review when ratings or feedback appear unfair, inaccurate, or inconsistent with documented scope and policy.

When you can dispute a rating
  • Rating contradicts documented scope compliance
  • Feedback is unrelated to approved deliverables
  • Communication logs support your position
  • A dispute was resolved in your favor
  • Feedback includes abusive language

Disputes must be evidence-based, not dissatisfaction alone.

What is not considered an unfair rating

  • Client dissatisfaction within scope
  • Revision-related frustration
  • Minor quality disagreement
  • Personal opinion expressed professionally

Subjective feedback is allowed. Abuse is not.

How to raise a rating dispute

  1. Submit a review request through dashboard
  2. Provide clear explanation of concern
  3. Reference milestone documentation
  4. Attach communication history if needed

Requests should be filed within a reasonable timeframe after rating submission.

How GigBig reviews disputes

  • Scope alignment verification
  • Communication log review
  • Dispute outcome reference where applicable
  • Project Manager assessment
  • Pattern analysis of past performance

Evaluation is structured and documentation-based.

Possible outcomes

  • Rating remains unchanged
  • Internal weighting may be adjusted
  • Inappropriate language may be removed
  • Visibility impact may be modified
  • Action may be taken on abusive feedback

All outcomes are policy-based.

Protection against abusive ratings

  • No harassment in feedback
  • No threat-based rating manipulation
  • No discriminatory remarks
  • No false allegations without basis

Violations may trigger account review.

Impact of filing a rating dispute

  • Does not automatically remove the rating
  • Does not penalize the freelancer
  • Does not affect ongoing payouts

It triggers structured evaluation only.

Role of the Project Manager

  • Provides context for evaluation
  • Clarifies scope alignment
  • Confirms dispute outcome history
  • Supports fair review process

Balanced oversight supports platform credibility.

Why this process matters

  • Fair evaluation
  • Protection against misuse
  • Professional accountability
  • Transparent governance
  • Platform credibility

It balances client voice with freelancer protection.