Dispute Resolution Process

Evidence-based resolution, not emotional decisions.

GigBig follows a structured dispute resolution process to handle disagreements fairly, transparently, and based on documented evidence. The process protects both parties and maintains platform integrity.

Disputes may involve
  • Scope alignment
  • Deliverable quality
  • Revision boundaries
  • Timeline adherence
  • Package duration usage
  • Payment release

When does the dispute process begin?

  • A milestone is contested
  • Approval is refused due to scope disagreement
  • Payment release is challenged
  • Project Manager cannot resolve the issue

Formal documentation triggers structured review.

Step-by-step dispute resolution

1. Initial review by Project Manager
  • Scope documentation reviewed
  • Communication logs examined
  • Milestone definitions verified
  • Feedback alignment checked

Many issues are resolved at this stage.

2. Formal escalation
  • Dispute escalated internally
  • All documentation collected
  • Deliverables reviewed against approved scope
  • Timeline commitments evaluated
  • Package duration usage assessed if applicable

Everything is evidence-based.

3. Structured evaluation
  • Original scope agreement
  • Milestone structure
  • Revision history
  • Communication logs
  • Approval workflow
  • Platform policies

Subjective preference does not determine outcome.

4. Resolution determination
  • Revision direction within scope
  • Clarified scope enforcement
  • Timeline adjustment
  • Structured partial payment decision
  • Fund release confirmation
  • Policy enforcement action

All outcomes are documented in the dashboard.

Dispute handling in Single Service

  • Focus on predefined deliverables
  • Timeline adherence reviewed
  • Revision boundaries examined
  • Predefined scope is primary reference

Dispute handling in Team Service

  • Cross-role execution evaluated
  • Package day utilization reviewed
  • Consolidated outputs assessed
  • Dependency sequencing considered

Team complexity is factored into decision-making.

Escrow protection during dispute

  • Funds remain secured in escrow
  • No payment released prematurely
  • Resolution determines distribution

Escrow protects financial fairness.

Professional conduct review

  • Communication logs reviewed
  • Platform conduct policies referenced
  • Corrective action may be taken

Professional standards are enforced.

What the dispute process does not guarantee

  • Automatically favoring clients
  • Automatically favoring freelancers
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Scope expansion without approval
  • Overriding documented agreements

Decisions are policy-based.

Why structured dispute resolution matters

  • Protects both parties
  • Reduces emotional escalation
  • Maintains platform trust
  • Ensures financial security
  • Strengthens professional accountability

It reinforces the managed service model.